Most popular equation in physic E = mc2, is like a monument of science nowadays.
If anyone on this Earth dare to deny that already grounded in every human mind equation, and theory behind it, would be or a very crazy or a really great mind.
So, it is worth to try. ;)
Taken for granted theory already evaluate anyway. It is not much in common with many equation from other fields of physic, where "E" as energy, "m" as mass and "c" as the speed of light is taken. How much any other equation has in common of speed of light and energy of representation by E in famous E = mc2.
Almost nothing. It is just incredibly taken as genius, but it is not much more we can get from that. I know, it is not standard thinking. Simply, If we want to say, how much of energy is in some X... and that is very interesting part of making any explanation. Just because we used to thing in space - time categories, it is a little bit more difficult imagine something without space, shape, without any environment. If we want to point some thing, it must be in some environment. Even it is something without solid shape as wind, taste, color, etc.
Then for simple our example, lets take a green box on grace. What energy that box is having now? Can you define it by speed of light? No - it would be nonsense, because it is nothing in common with speed of light now. Then equation E = mc2 isn't good here. Even we don't know that mass of this example box for put in that equation. Then, what energy has it?
We must take some other parameters to have specific equation to calculate energy it owns. Lets outline all of them. No, you can say, it's waste of time now. Yes, I agree, there in nowadays science we have so many, really many parameterizes of some one box, and that is not everything for define its energy E yet. That can be many of kinds of energy it has. We don't know what equation we can use, just because we don't know, what we want to do, or for what movement will be exposed that example box.
So, that equation E = mc2 isn't useful actually.
Why then scientists had rubby faces with talking about that. I think, they didn't have any idea how to link such many of already existed theories with energy of light. It is some misstatement in that way of thinking.
That equation is already connected with space, and made mass as a indicator of that specific energy. Then it isn't so universal. There is possible to have any really universal equation for all energies, kinetic, potential and many others ready to use in all our known world? I think it is.
In purpose I used term of energy with mass in one sentence. Just because mass is something we used to use for things, to measure HOW heavy they are. On earth. In some SPACE - TIME environment.
Then, one thing as a conclusion. If we want to take some energy, and make from that any use, equation E = mc2 isn't helpful. It is opposite, not saying how much of energy has anything we want to exam, but it says what energy it would have in some not real environment. It is not wrong, but not efficient actually.
In any part of making any calculation in physics we must take some other parameterizes and use many of other calculations to make some right at the end.
Anyway, if we want to just say about energy in such example box, it is sort of useless. If we make some calculation in any field of nowadays science there are many of variables we must know. Before we calculate anything. To built buildings, bridges, engines for many transports like cars, planes, etc.
Being more specific, all around is energy.
Literally.
Then, why we can't use some universal rules for all energies we already defined as humans.
It seems be very controversial, but it isn't as much. In some few years, I hope, I finish my theory of 3-sides of energy, or 3 - parts of energy. Making all calculations more efficient and more understandable.
In some time I'm going to tame our space-time singularity as well as Einstein made it with energy of light.
Greetings.
Magdalena Korzeniewska,
2018, Lega, Poland.
If anyone on this Earth dare to deny that already grounded in every human mind equation, and theory behind it, would be or a very crazy or a really great mind.
So, it is worth to try. ;)
Taken for granted theory already evaluate anyway. It is not much in common with many equation from other fields of physic, where "E" as energy, "m" as mass and "c" as the speed of light is taken. How much any other equation has in common of speed of light and energy of representation by E in famous E = mc2.
Almost nothing. It is just incredibly taken as genius, but it is not much more we can get from that. I know, it is not standard thinking. Simply, If we want to say, how much of energy is in some X... and that is very interesting part of making any explanation. Just because we used to thing in space - time categories, it is a little bit more difficult imagine something without space, shape, without any environment. If we want to point some thing, it must be in some environment. Even it is something without solid shape as wind, taste, color, etc.
Then for simple our example, lets take a green box on grace. What energy that box is having now? Can you define it by speed of light? No - it would be nonsense, because it is nothing in common with speed of light now. Then equation E = mc2 isn't good here. Even we don't know that mass of this example box for put in that equation. Then, what energy has it?
We must take some other parameters to have specific equation to calculate energy it owns. Lets outline all of them. No, you can say, it's waste of time now. Yes, I agree, there in nowadays science we have so many, really many parameterizes of some one box, and that is not everything for define its energy E yet. That can be many of kinds of energy it has. We don't know what equation we can use, just because we don't know, what we want to do, or for what movement will be exposed that example box.
So, that equation E = mc2 isn't useful actually.
Why then scientists had rubby faces with talking about that. I think, they didn't have any idea how to link such many of already existed theories with energy of light. It is some misstatement in that way of thinking.
That equation is already connected with space, and made mass as a indicator of that specific energy. Then it isn't so universal. There is possible to have any really universal equation for all energies, kinetic, potential and many others ready to use in all our known world? I think it is.
In purpose I used term of energy with mass in one sentence. Just because mass is something we used to use for things, to measure HOW heavy they are. On earth. In some SPACE - TIME environment.
Then, one thing as a conclusion. If we want to take some energy, and make from that any use, equation E = mc2 isn't helpful. It is opposite, not saying how much of energy has anything we want to exam, but it says what energy it would have in some not real environment. It is not wrong, but not efficient actually.
In any part of making any calculation in physics we must take some other parameterizes and use many of other calculations to make some right at the end.
Anyway, if we want to just say about energy in such example box, it is sort of useless. If we make some calculation in any field of nowadays science there are many of variables we must know. Before we calculate anything. To built buildings, bridges, engines for many transports like cars, planes, etc.
Being more specific, all around is energy.
Literally.
Then, why we can't use some universal rules for all energies we already defined as humans.
It seems be very controversial, but it isn't as much. In some few years, I hope, I finish my theory of 3-sides of energy, or 3 - parts of energy. Making all calculations more efficient and more understandable.
In some time I'm going to tame our space-time singularity as well as Einstein made it with energy of light.
Greetings.
Magdalena Korzeniewska,
2018, Lega, Poland.
